Sorry, I forgot to label this message as the [RESULT], so I will do that
now to make it easier to find in the archives if need be.
-> richard
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Ok, I think it has been long enough to call this vote.
* +1 votes - Richard S. Hall, Karl Pauls, Clement Escoffier, John E.
Conlon, Cameron Taggart, Rob Walker, Rick Litton, Nektarios K.
Papadopoulos, Alex Karasulu, Francesco Furfari, Manuel Santillán,
Felix Meschberger, Didier Donsez, Marcel Offermans, Stephane
Frenot, Glyn Normington, Enrique Rodriguez, Olivier Gruber, and
Jose L. Ruiz.
* 0 votes - none.
* -1 votes - none.
I am happy to see this vote pass overwhelmingly so that we can move
forward quickly with an initial release.
At this point, we can start the next steps required for creating the
initial release, which are:
1. Solicit feedback about any outstanding issues from the example
release archive previously posted (and subsequently creating a new
example release to deal with any raised issues).
2. Choose a person to be the release manager (I will start this
discussion in a separate message next).
3. Once the release manager feels we are in good shape, I guess we
will need to vote on the release.
Not much left to do now!!
-> richard
Richard S. Hall wrote:
In order to make progress on a public Felix release, I propose that
we use a simple "zip-file" release approach as opposed to an
installer-based approach. Please vote on your preference.
[ ] +1 Agree to a zip-file approach for Felix release.
[ ] 0 I don't care.
[ ] -1 Opposed to a zip-file approach for Felix release.
