haven't tried, but should use them
i don't see the scope as the solution, is a workaround, it's not
designed to do that
there are two cases here:
- bundle = original library + OSGi manifest
I think this is the best solution, if you do it from the original
library pom, you just need the bundle:manifest goal, if you do it from
outside somehow you should deploy the dependencies section from the
pom in the original library instead of the current one.
- bundle = several libraries
this will require http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2316 to be
implement first to list all the dependencies provided by the bundle
On 3/25/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Interesting - btw, does it handle top-level dependencies with 'provided' scope
as required by FELIX-262 (ie. to avoid the new artifact having transitive deps)
On 26/03/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I commented in 255 about this, it'd be easy to add a parameter to
> FELIX-199 bundleall goal to specify how deep to process the tree, you
> could set it to 1 to bundle only the direct dependencies
>
> On 3/25/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Alin,
> >
> > Thanks for the comments - I'm not completely adverse to the idea of handling
> > the transitive dependency issue inside the plugin, just questioning the
benefit
> > given there's (imho) a workable solution.
> >
> > I'm also worried that changing the way the bundle pulls in artifacts might
break
> > other users. I believe this issue is only for the 'wrapping jar' case
> > - is that right?
> >
> > Anyway, this is just my own opinion - looking forward to hearing more views
:)
> >
> > Cheers, Stuart
> >
> > On 26/03/07, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Nice summary Stuart,
> > >
> > > I also posted some comments on FELIX-262 and FELIX-255.
> > >
> > > Alin Dreghiciu
> > >
> > > On 3/25/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > Currently there are 8 open issues for the maven-bundle-plugin. I've
> > > > written up a
> > > > short one-line status for each of them (inc. # of votes, whether a patch
> > > > exists)
> > > > along with a suggested course of action in another table. (see attached
> > > > file)
> > > >
> > > > The suggested actions are all MHO, so apologies if I've misrepresented
any
> > > > of the issues, or the patches. Please post a follow-up message pointing
> > > > out
> > > > any mistakes, updates or alternative suggestions.
> > > >
> > > > Basically I recommend looking at FELIX-199 first, as it also solves
> > > > several
> > > > other issues. The one thorny area is over maven dependencies: whether to
> > > > get the user to handle this outside in the pom with other plugins, or to
> > > > add
> > > > options to the bundle plugin for the sake of convenience
(FELIX-255/262).
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers, Stuart
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers, Stuart
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
