On 3/25/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26/03/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> haven't tried, but should use them
>
> i don't see the scope as the solution, is a workaround, it's not
> designed to do that
Yep, I'd like to avoid mis-using the maven dependency system if pos.
BTW, what do you think about using the maven-dependency-plugin as
another way to wrap library artifacts? (for the non-recursive use-case)
>
> there are two cases here:
>
> - bundle = original library + OSGi manifest
> I think this is the best solution, if you do it from the original
> library pom, you just need the bundle:manifest goal, if you do it from
> outside somehow you should deploy the dependencies section from the
> pom in the original library instead of the current one.
Would this be in a separate 'wrap' goal - personally, I prefer plugins which
have many, simple goals that you can combine as necessary, rather than
one swiss-army-knife goal with lots of options.
yes, it's easy, and probably a good addition
>
> - bundle = several libraries
> this will require http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2316 to be
> implement first to list all the dependencies provided by the bundle
>
Do you have a timeline for MNG-2316?
unfortunately no, it will depend who's willing to help and how 2.1 goes
>
> On 3/25/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Interesting - btw, does it handle top-level dependencies with 'provided'
scope
> > as required by FELIX-262 (ie. to avoid the new artifact having transitive
deps)
> >
> > On 26/03/07, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I commented in 255 about this, it'd be easy to add a parameter to
> > > FELIX-199 bundleall goal to specify how deep to process the tree, you
> > > could set it to 1 to bundle only the direct dependencies
> > >
> > > On 3/25/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi Alin,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the comments - I'm not completely adverse to the idea of
handling
> > > > the transitive dependency issue inside the plugin, just questioning the
benefit
> > > > given there's (imho) a workable solution.
> > > >
> > > > I'm also worried that changing the way the bundle pulls in artifacts
might break
> > > > other users. I believe this issue is only for the 'wrapping jar' case
> > > > - is that right?
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, this is just my own opinion - looking forward to hearing more
views :)
> > > >
> > > > Cheers, Stuart
> > > >
> > > > On 26/03/07, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Nice summary Stuart,
> > > > >
> > > > > I also posted some comments on FELIX-262 and FELIX-255.
> > > > >
> > > > > Alin Dreghiciu
> > > > >
> > > > > On 3/25/07, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently there are 8 open issues for the maven-bundle-plugin. I've
> > > > > > written up a
> > > > > > short one-line status for each of them (inc. # of votes, whether a
patch
> > > > > > exists)
> > > > > > along with a suggested course of action in another table. (see
attached
> > > > > > file)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The suggested actions are all MHO, so apologies if I've
misrepresented any
> > > > > > of the issues, or the patches. Please post a follow-up message
pointing
> > > > > > out
> > > > > > any mistakes, updates or alternative suggestions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Basically I recommend looking at FELIX-199 first, as it also solves
> > > > > > several
> > > > > > other issues. The one thorny area is over maven dependencies:
whether to
> > > > > > get the user to handle this outside in the pom with other plugins,
or to
> > > > > > add
> > > > > > options to the bundle plugin for the sake of convenience
(FELIX-255/262).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cheers, Stuart
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Cheers, Stuart
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers, Stuart
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
