On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 13:06 +0100, Rhythmic Fistman wrote:
> On 2/16/07, skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Lets remove some artificial barriers.

Go ahead .. :)

The main page is not in the repository .. everything else is.

> There should be:
> 
>  - a ready to go cut'n'pasteable svn checkout command immediately
>    visible on the first page of the web page.
>  (svn co https://felix.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/felix/felix/trunk felix)

only works on unix but, i guess windows ppl will get the hint

>   Hell, stick it in your .sigs and go and cause some [new] trouble on
>   mailing lists that work. Felix: HOFs, lightweight threads, c10k
> contender: svn co ...

I'm not the only one with a sig.. yours is a bit bare :)

>  - a user faq (how to write hello world) 

First page of the tutorial?


>  - an accessible mailing list (the sourceforge one isn't). I've been using 
> this
>    gmail address to post to usenet and it has never once given me even
> a fraction
>    of the pain in the hole that sourceforge has.

Whereas I can't get Google to register me at all, whilst
I've been using my sf email as my sole public email address
for half a decade.

SF uses the most popular email list manager
in the world.. almost everyone else uses Mailman too.

>  - a way to commit to the repository. unlink commiting from the
> mailing list. 

The link to the mailing list is essential IMHO: it reports
changes as they're made, otherwise there's no easy way to
track what is being done.

> why
>    should the difficulties in committing [rare] be heaped onto the 
> difficulties
>    of asking a question [common]? 

Only subscribers can post to the list, to stop spam.

> it effectively rules out both. if this were
>    as easy as the google groups posting, that would be great. (is this what
>    google code is?). if people can actually get felix, ask a question on the
>    mailing list and form an opionon on what'd they'd like to change, let them
>    submit the odd patch/svn diff via the mailing list that we apply manually,
>   like happens on the SDL mailing list. if they get serious then we can fiddle
>   with accounts/permissions.

People can submit patches right now if they want.
I'm just lazy, I'd rather they just commit them.

> 
> There shouldn't be:
> 
>  - outdated tarballs. if it's a problem keeping them up to date via
>    a script or somesuch, then better not to have them at all. 

The makefile can build, test, tar, upload, and unpack the doco
in a single target -- assuming ssh is up, which it isn't at 
the moment.

But it is a pain, because if there's a bug, it's a bugged
tarball and I have to do the whole thing again.

> they waste
>    the one-time "initial effort" of newbies. 

yeah.

> svn's common enough.

For developers..

>  - two web pages. felix.sf.net and the wiki, both mined with "dummy"
>    felix tarballs. the wiki looks better and google seems to like it
>    more. why not retire it in favour of the wiki?

Because, 99% of the web site is machine generated.
In fact the WHOLE website is entirely machine generated
except for the home page.

There's no way to store generated data in a Wiki.

>  - sourceforge. it's shit.

But everything else is shittier. 

SF is big, being on it gives people a sense of confidence
that the repository won't just evaporate. It also provides
a STABLE set of web and email addresses.

I agree the services are so crash hot: not indexing the
email lists sucks. I get really annoyed when the top
project is always something *already* popular, and they
rank all the wrong things to determine activity.

I guess I live with it because I care about Felix,
not the site it is hosted on.


-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language

Reply via email to