skaller wrote: > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 13:06 +0100, Rhythmic Fistman wrote: > > >> - sourceforge. it's shit. >> > > Here's my take, roughly: SF has pros and cons, and one of the > pros is that we're already using it. > > If we put a wiki here, a mailing list there, a web site > some other place things will become unmanageable. > > A commercial grade server to host everything is another > story. Async could fund that. But note this means stuff like > root access and also direct net connectivity: after all we > want to test things like a Felix web server. >
My dreamhost account can do a good chuck of that, although we'd have to use the whole fastcgi in order to hook into their apache server. It's not super fast, but I'm sure it'd be fine for the short term. However, I like the idea of other people hosting. I wouldn't want to have to worry about backups. Dreamhost does do that, but only for the last 30 days. I'm sure google, blogger, and sourceforge all have much better backup systems. What if we self-hosted our blog/cms as the front end, then were backed by either code.google.com or sourceforge for svn, the mailing list, and tracker? -e ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
