On 9/18/07, skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, they're not interchangeable since (1,2) doesn't specify > any labels.
Thats okay. Are you planning on implementing it? > in any case this now works: Cool! Oh, do you think we could declare types this way too? Maybe: typedef foo = (a:int, b:int); Or to have it similar to tuples: typedef foo = a:int * b:int; > however: > > (a=1,2,b=c) > > is not actually ambiguous: it means > > (a=(1,2),b=c) > > and Dypgen should parse this correctly. However I banned it anyhow, > and forced the extra (). That makes sense. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Felix-language mailing list Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
