On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Dobes Vandermeer <dob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:08 AM, john skaller <
> skal...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
>> YMMV but for the moment I just wouldn't bother changing it: I don't much
>>
> like ** and ,, is worse but it makes sense.
>>
>
> Hmmm actually given this won't be used all that much, maybe it isn't worth
> quibbling over. I'll forget about this "problem".
>
>
BUT I did run into a place where they were using the operators ":*:" and
":,:" for something similar to "**" and ",," although I think they are
alluding to the "::" as a cons operator which isn't used that way in Felix.
Anyway ... seems like a slight improvement, and these could have its own
operator associativity and precedence unlike **.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Felix-language mailing list
Felix-language@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/felix-language
