Hi MC,
Whenever I see something of interest, I use CISTI which
allows you full access to the "neverending" research on whatever one wishes. The
study that I recall that I ordered a few years ago that confirmed
non-aggressive transmission (other than "paw flailing" at their
feeding station) was this one. Here's the abstract:
: Vet Rec. 2000 Apr 8;146(15):419-24. Related Articles, Links
Long-term impact on a closed household of pet cats of natural infection
with feline coronavirus, feline leukaemia virus and feline immunodeficiency
virus.
Addie DD, Dennis JM, Toth S, Callanan JJ, Reid S, Jarrett O.
Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Glasgow Veterinary
School, Bearsden.
A closed household of 26 cats in which feline coronavirus (FCoV), feline
leukaemia virus (FeLV) and feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) were endemic was
observed for 10 years.
Each cat was seropositive for FCoV on at least one occasion and the
infection was maintained by reinfection. After 10 years, three of six surviving
cats were still seropositive.
Only one cat, which was also infected with FIV, developed feline infectious
peritonitis (FIP). Rising anti-FCoV antibody titres did not indicate that the
cat would develop FIP.
The FeLV infection was self-limiting because all seven of the initially
viraemic cats died within five years and the remainder were immune.
However, FeLV had the greatest impact on mortality. Nine cats were
initially FIV-positive and six more cats became infected during the course of
the study, without evidence of having been bitten.
The FIV infection did not adversely affect the cats' life
expectancy.
PMID: 10811262 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Kind regards,
Glenda
Our FeLV/FIV kitties & other stuff:
http://community.webshots.com/user/sicky_icicle
http://community.webshots.com/user/sicky_icicle
----- Original Message -----
From: TenHouseCats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: OT:FIV false positive?
> non-aggressive contact passing the FIV virus--that goes against
> everything i have read and if there IS such info, it's important that
> all of us with positives know! (i tend to suspect it's not current
> info, but since things change so quickly now that they're actually
> doing research, i'm open....)
>
> thanks!
>
> MC