Thank you, Kerry so much.
Unfortunately, they did not,,, because he said to Greg that no one did which
was disappointing – but the important thing is that he knows now that I am
not,, and they can use it against me in the future. I actually did cry towards the end of Greg’s
testimony (he testified as my neighbor), when he said that he does not know
anyone who treat even human as well as she treats her cats .. and he said, if
you ever lose a cat, and Hideyo happens to be the one who found you and take
care your cat,, you are the luckiest person.. I can’t think of anyone
better to take care of cats.. I also did the same thing when introducing your
and Nina’s letters…. From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of MacKenzie, Kerry N. Once again, you prove what a hero you are,
Hideyo. You know we are all behind you. Go for it. I'm glad you had Greg there; what a
jerk the city atty is. How dare he make such an assumption? Who
the hell does he think he is? Well, he doesn't know what a fight(er) he has on
his hands, does he? I want to help with a contribution to
your legal fees; I'll email you directly tonight. You are just THE BEST, Hideyo! much love and big hugs Kerry PS: do you
really think the people you thought were going to speak for you did not? I
guess it sure sounds like that. As an ex boss of mine who's departed this
world once said, People can be so disappointing. (Well, we all
know that, don't we?) My jaw hit the floor when I read yr subject field. Like
all of us I'd been thinking about you and waiting and wondering all day. -----Original Message----- Thank you so very much for all your support, especially,
Michelle – I am so grateful for everything you have done for me. I had a hearing this morning, to make it short, I
lost. I cried for about 5 mins but now I am back in business. I am
going to appeal to District court. Michelle, what came down was that, as we expected, the
hearing officer does not have authority to declare that the law is
unconstitutional so he had to deny my appeal. But I did establish that
I’m not a hoarder, they agreed that I take such a good care of animals
– the only issue is the sq. ft calculation of the law, which has no
rational base. The city attorney was really harsh on me, I guess all the
people who I thought talked to him off records, they did not.. so based on the
report, he made an assumption that I was a hoarder and he came down really hard
on me.. here I am.. I am trying to defend my case as a lawyer who has no idea
what I am doing.. but during the break, Greg talked to him, and he calm down..
again they acknowledge the fact that there is no nuisance and all the animals
are very well cared for, which was a big deal.. the only thing I have to fight
against is about the law being unconstitutional… After the hearing was
over, the hearing officer told me that, I made a good argument,, appeal to
District court… you can do it!.. So the meantime, Greg
thought the city attorney is probably willing to make a deal with me as
it’s going to be expensive to go to District court.. or Supreme Court for
the matter as I am going to go all the way if I have to protect my cats!
If the law is find unconstitutional, the city will risk the entire pet limit
being knocked down, so Greg feels that they might not want to do that. Anyway,,
I wanted to give you the update. I have a criminal hearing coming up on 1/12 – Greg
thought that I should make a same argument and if some reason, the law is found
unconstitutional at the metro level, it will be easier to win at District level..
We will see. Though I did not know what I was doing.. I am proud of
myself of my accomplishment – if I ended up going to district or supreme
level and ended up striking out the pet limit law,, I guess that’s
what’s meant to be.. I will not give up.. not just yet… everyone,
please keep praying for me and my babies. I am also thinking of seeing Mayor to see if there’s
any thing he can do -- IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE. Any advice expressed above as to tax matters was neither written nor intended by the sender or Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP to be used and cannot be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed under U.S. tax law. If any person uses or refers to any such tax advice in promoting, marketing or recommending a partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement to any taxpayer, then (i) the advice was written to support the promotion or marketing (by a person other than Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP) of that transaction or matter, and (ii) such taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayers particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. |
Title: Message
- Re: I lost my court hearing today - Barb Moermond
- RE: I lost my court hearing today - MacKenzie, Kerry N.
- RE: I lost my court hearing today - Hideyo Yamamoto
- Re: I lost my court hearing today - Lernermichelle
- RE: I lost my court hearing today - MacKenzie, Kerry N.
- Re: I lost my court hearing today - catatonya
- Re: I lost my court hearing today - Karolyn Lount
- RE: I lost my court hearing today - Hideyo Yamamoto