On 1 October 2015 at 11:33, Martin Sandve Alnæs <marti...@simula.no> wrote:
> Ok, what about requiring it iff mpi is present? > It does mean checking before using it, which can be untidy and makes it a sort of 'half-dependency'. Is there something in particular you want to use in mpi4py? Garth > 1. okt. 2015 11:59 skrev "Garth N. Wells" <gn...@cam.ac.uk>: > >> >> On 1 October 2015 at 10:44, Martin Sandve Alnæs <marti...@simula.no> >> wrote: >> >>> Can we make mpi4py a required dependency for fenics? Any reasons not to? >>> >>> >> To keep it simple, I presume it would mean making MPI a dependency for >> FEniCS (?), which is not presently the case. >> >> Garth >> >> >>> Martin >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> fenics mailing list >>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>> >>> >>
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list fenics@fenicsproject.org http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
