I've used it in the new dijitso module for mpi awareness in jit. I don't want that to depend on dolfin. I think it's possible to work around, I can consider other options. 1. okt. 2015 12:54 skrev "Garth N. Wells" <gn...@cam.ac.uk>:
> > On 1 October 2015 at 11:33, Martin Sandve Alnæs <marti...@simula.no> > wrote: > >> Ok, what about requiring it iff mpi is present? >> > > It does mean checking before using it, which can be untidy and makes it a > sort of 'half-dependency'. > > Is there something in particular you want to use in mpi4py? > > Garth > > > >> 1. okt. 2015 11:59 skrev "Garth N. Wells" <gn...@cam.ac.uk>: >> >>> >>> On 1 October 2015 at 10:44, Martin Sandve Alnæs <marti...@simula.no> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Can we make mpi4py a required dependency for fenics? Any reasons not to? >>>> >>>> >>> To keep it simple, I presume it would mean making MPI a dependency for >>> FEniCS (?), which is not presently the case. >>> >>> Garth >>> >>> >>>> Martin >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> fenics mailing list >>>> fenics@fenicsproject.org >>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>>> >>>> >>> >
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list fenics@fenicsproject.org http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
