On Wednesday February 9 2011 10:37:37 David Ham wrote: > On 09/02/11 18:14, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Wednesday February 9 2011 10:10:04 Anders Logg wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:52:21AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > >>> Are there any others that have got a similare answer? > >> > >> No problems so far. Here's what we have so far: > >> http://www.fenicsproject.org/pub/copyright/authors/ > >> http://www.fenicsproject.org/pub/copyright/institutions/ > > > > I guess the Cambridge statement is not correct? > > > > Johan > > Cambridge are an odd case. Their IP rules specifically give copyright in > most things to the individual staff who wrote them. That's the rule > book. Basically it proves that Garth doesn't need a letter from Cambridge.
Ok! I did not bother read the whole document ;) Johan > Regards, > > David _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
