On Wednesday February 9 2011 10:47:32 Garth N. Wells wrote: > On 09/02/11 18:45, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Wednesday February 9 2011 10:37:37 David Ham wrote: > >> On 09/02/11 18:14, Johan Hake wrote: > >>> On Wednesday February 9 2011 10:10:04 Anders Logg wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:52:21AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > >>>>> Are there any others that have got a similare answer? > >>>> > >>>> No problems so far. Here's what we have so far: > >>>> http://www.fenicsproject.org/pub/copyright/authors/ > >>>> http://www.fenicsproject.org/pub/copyright/institutions/ > >>> > >>> I guess the Cambridge statement is not correct? > >>> > >>> Johan > >> > >> Cambridge are an odd case. Their IP rules specifically give copyright in > >> most things to the individual staff who wrote them. That's the rule > >> book. Basically it proves that Garth doesn't need a letter from > >> Cambridge. > > > > Ok! I did not bother read the whole document ;) > > You should. It's a great read.
:) I bet you have! Johan > Garth > > > Johan > > > >> Regards, > >> > >> David > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
