On 6 March 2013 12:53, Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:10:59PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> It was suggested earlier today that we make a new release. No one has >>> objected and I have been appointed as the release manager, so we are >>> then at step four in the development model [1]. >>> Tomorrow, March 6, I will fork the development branches into 1.2.x >>> branches [2] to prepare for the release of FEniCS 1.2. The buildbot >>> will then be updated to build the 1.2.x branches, and when it is >>> green, we can go ahead and make the release. Alternatively, we can >>> wait one week as suggested by the development model. Development can >>> of course continue in the development branches, but only bug fixes >>> will be merged into the 1.2.x branches to be included in the 1.2 >>> release. >>> [1] http://fenicsproject.org/contributing/development_model.html >>> [2] DOLFIN, FFC, Instant, UFC (2.2.x) and UFL are needed >> >> Sounds great. I don't think we should need to wait a week. As soon as >> the buildbot is green we can make a release. Then 1.2.1 can follow if >> we find (more) bugs. > > ok, I have made the branches for the 1.2.x series and set the expected > release date to Friday March 8. >
Can I squeeze in our HDF5 updates? I'm just double-checking the tests now. Garth > Johannes > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
