On 6 March 2013 12:59, Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 6 March 2013 12:53, Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:10:59PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> It was suggested earlier today that we make a new release. No one has >>>>> objected and I have been appointed as the release manager, so we are >>>>> then at step four in the development model [1]. >>>>> Tomorrow, March 6, I will fork the development branches into 1.2.x >>>>> branches [2] to prepare for the release of FEniCS 1.2. The buildbot >>>>> will then be updated to build the 1.2.x branches, and when it is >>>>> green, we can go ahead and make the release. Alternatively, we can >>>>> wait one week as suggested by the development model. Development can >>>>> of course continue in the development branches, but only bug fixes >>>>> will be merged into the 1.2.x branches to be included in the 1.2 >>>>> release. >>>>> [1] http://fenicsproject.org/contributing/development_model.html >>>>> [2] DOLFIN, FFC, Instant, UFC (2.2.x) and UFL are needed >>>> >>>> Sounds great. I don't think we should need to wait a week. As soon as >>>> the buildbot is green we can make a release. Then 1.2.1 can follow if >>>> we find (more) bugs. >>> >>> ok, I have made the branches for the 1.2.x series and set the expected >>> release date to Friday March 8. >>> >> >> Can I squeeze in our HDF5 updates? I'm just double-checking the tests now. > > ok! >
I pushed the changes to lp:dolfin. Garth > Johannes _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
