As far as I know, Sphinx only can only index tables that have a unique
numeric id (e.g. and auto-incrementing int)....  I looked at using it, but
we use md5 hashes for the id/primary key on the tables I want to index... so
we were out of luck.
For what it's worth, I use Ferret 0.11.6 and love it.  I re-index about ~90
million rows (and growing) worth of "stuff" (title, description, author,
etc...) every night...  works like a champ.  Searching is fast (provided you
don't want to sort on something other than relevance) and accurate.

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:57 AM, arvind gautam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> How bout Sphinx?
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Eric Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> I would also be interested in Ferret alternatives for IR in ruby, a
>> simple search on rubyforge returned mainly a bunch of projects that
>> look to be abandoned...
>>
>> - Rise (does not appear to be actively developed)
>> - rubylucene (looks to be a dead project)
>> - Ruby Simple Indexer (also looks dead)
>> - Ruby Odeum (simple ruby-bindings for a fast inverted index)
>>
>> If anyone knows of any ruby IR projects which are mature, and are
>> being actively developed I would love to hear about them.
>>
>> Thanks -- Eric
>>
>> On Wednesday, August 27, at 10:29, Paul Lynch wrote:
>>  > I've been using Ferret in a project still under development, and it
>>  > works pretty well.  As far as I can tell, the project is dying, if not
>>  > already dead.  David Balmain is still the only listed developer, and
>>  > he seems to have moved on to other things.  However, since the
>>  > software is still meeting my project's needs, I am not terribly
>>  > bothered by that.  I suppose that eventually (in a few years?)
>>  > something will change enough that Ferret will stop working, and then
>>  > we'll have to find something else.
>>  >
>>  > If you can find an alternative that has active development, I would
>>  > recommend you go with that.  (And if you find one, please post about
>>  > it.)  But, if you can't, Ferret will probably be good enough for a
>>  > while.
>>  >
>>  > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Fernando Parisotto
>>  > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  > > Hi all,
>>  > >
>>  > > I'm new on the list, and glad to participate.
>>  > > I would like to make some questions about the ferret project...
>>  > > - Is the http://ferret.davebalmain.com/ official page of the
>> project? (I'm
>>  > > always getting 502 Bad Gateway)
>>  > > - Where I can find the road map of the project?
>>  > > - In the http://rubyforge.org/projects/ferret/ I see the last
>> realize was in
>>  > > November 28, 2007, that is true?
>>  > > - Is ferret discontinued?
>>  > >
>>  > > Please don't take this questions as offensive, I really like to know
>> about
>>  > > how ferret is reliable for a long life product.
>>  > > Here on my company we are planning to make a big product with a
>> indexing
>>  > > engine, I would like to know if the ferret is "alive".
>>  > > Thanks for the answers!
>>  > >
>>  > > --
>>  > > Atenciosamente - Best regards,
>>  > >
>>  > > Fernando Luiz Parisotto
>>  > >
>>  > > _______________________________________________
>>  > > Ferret-talk mailing list
>>  > > [email protected]
>>  > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
>>  > >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > --
>>  > Paul Lynch
>>  > Aquilent, Inc.
>>  > National Library of Medicine (Contractor)
>>  > _______________________________________________
>>  > Ferret-talk mailing list
>>  > [email protected]
>>  > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
>>
>> --
>> schulte
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ferret-talk mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ferret-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk
>
_______________________________________________
Ferret-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ferret-talk

Reply via email to