[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk) wrote, > Assuming that the only finalized things will be ForeignObj, touch can > have the type ForeignObj -> IO (). Perhaps it's be more efficient to > touch the ForeignObj# inside ForeignObj. How about about objects that got a finalizer with addFinalizer? Manuel
- RE: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Haskell Simon Marlow
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Hask... Keith Wansbrough
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents from ... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Hask... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents from ... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents f... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj conten... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Hask... Axel Simon
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents from ... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents from ... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents f... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj conten... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj c... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Accessing ForeignO... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Accessing ForeignObj contents from ... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Haskell Simon Marlow
- RE: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Hask... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents from ... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Haskell Simon Marlow
- RE: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Haskell Simon Marlow
- RE: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Hask... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
