Re: Accessing ForeignObj contents from Haskell

[Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk]

Fri, 18 Aug 2000 10:51:48 +1000, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:

> Therefore, it seems like a good idea to me to make the type of
> touch a bit more general.

It should be called touchForeignObj instead. It can be different
than the potential generic version: should ensure the existence of
ForeignObj# inside, not the whole ForeignObj. As addForeignFinalizer
is to addFinalizer.

-- 
 __("<  Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
 \__/
  ^^                      SYGNATURA ZAST�PCZA
QRCZAK