Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:01:48 +1100, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> So, how about the following.
I must admit that I like my own proposal better :-)
> So, as Marcin pointed out, the only use for a library object
> spec for ccall is so that interpreters know which handle to
> pass to dlsym(). I am not too fond of the idea that the
> interpreter has to try a dlsym() on all library objects that
> it did dlopen(). Or is this maybe not too bad?
As I see in ghc/rts/Linker.c, in the ELF case dlopen (NULL, RTLD_LAZY)
and dlopen (filename, RTLD_NOW | RTLD_GLOBAL) can be used to let the
linker find the library for each symbol. I don't know about Windows DLLs.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTÊPCZA
QRCZAK
_______________________________________________
FFI mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
