"Alastair Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > > So, as Marcin pointed out, the only use for a library object > > spec for ccall is so that interpreters know which handle to > > pass to dlsym(). > > This may be the only use but I think it's a very important use. > > > I am not too fond of the idea that the interpreter has to try > > a dlsym() on all library objects that it did dlopen(). > > Or is this maybe not too bad? > > I think it's just asking for trouble (for reasons given in earlier mail). Marcin just pointed out that you can use dlopen() in a way that it finds symbols without a library name. That should do, I think. Cheers, Manuel _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
- Summary of current change suggestions malcolm-ffi
- Re: Summary of current change suggestions Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Summary of current change suggestions Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Summary of current change suggestio... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Summary of current change suggestio... Alastair Reid
- RE: Summary of current change sugge... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Summary of current change s... Alastair Reid
- Re: Summary of current cha... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Summary of current cha... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Summary of current change suggestio... Alastair Reid
- RE: Summary of current change sugge... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Summary of current change sugge... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Summary of current change suggestions Simon Marlow
- RE: Summary of current change suggestio... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: Summary of current change suggestio... Alastair Reid
- RE: Summary of current change sugge... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty