Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just some small questions: Are we really going to change the signatures
> of newForeignPtr and addForeignPtrFinalizer from those which GHC has for
> ages to the new "C finaliser only" ones? Why don't we use other names
> and deprecate the old ones?
As I recall, there was considerable sympathy for using new names for
the C-finaliser-only functions, preferably incorporating the word "unsafe",
and no-one argued for re-using the old names with the new signatures.
Regards,
Malcolm
_______________________________________________
FFI mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
