Simon Marlow wrote: > [...] There was this, from Dean Herrington: > > http://haskell.cs.yale.edu/pipermail/ffi/2002-October/000940.html > > I don't have any strong feelings (I rarely do, where names are > concerned).
I would be happy with his proposal. We can leave the IORef stuff in IOExts as it is and use the new signatures and functions in Data.IORef. The only annoying thing is the signature of Data.IORef.modifyIORef, but we could declare the old signature as a bug... :-] Cheers, S. _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
