On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:05 PM Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > > Derek Buitenhuis (12020-04-17): > > Can you elaborate on why it's an abomination? It's so far been the only > > thing > > that has kept people from breaking movenc API use several times, > > specifically > > in relation to how it behaves for outputting fragments - and ffmpeg.c does > > not > > necessarily exercise these paths. API unit tests are good thing in my books, > > as an API-only user who has seen unintentional API breaks because ffmpeg.c > > doesn't use something specifically. > > I had not understood that it was an API test. Actually, I am rather > surprised that we have a "movenc API", I thought our muxers where mostly > interchangeable. > > Regards, >
I think he means a minimal application doing various things that test the muxer within the libavformat API, as opposed to utilizing a full-blown ffmpeg.c command line with an actual (or runtime generated) input, actual encoders etc. It tests movenc's logic according to various use cases that were implemented into the muxer. Jan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
