On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:51:18 +0200 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Le quintidi 5 messidor, an CCXXIII, wm4 a écrit : > > I think you're alone with this. > > I do not intend to push for it, it was just an extreme example. I do maths, > and there is one thing we learn: if you want to know how solid an argument > is, push it to the extreme. If you suspect f is monotonic and want to know > whether it is increasing or decreasing, look at its asymptotic behaviour. If > you want to know if libavremotefileoperations makes sense, wonder about > libspellcheck. People don't follow mathematic rules, and neither do human arguments. Not even software development does. > > libav* are for (de)muxing and decoding/encoding. > > libav* are for what developers want to make them for. The current architecture just doesn't allow it without committing API atrocities. (You might consider this "abuse", but I gave enough convincing examples.) _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
