On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde > <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Fixes Ticket4673 >> >> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> >> --- >> library.mak | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/library.mak b/library.mak >> index 29460b8..401da7c 100644 >> --- a/library.mak >> +++ b/library.mak >> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ $(SUBDIR)$(SLIBNAME): $(SUBDIR)$(SLIBNAME_WITH_MAJOR) >> >> $(SUBDIR)$(SLIBNAME_WITH_MAJOR): $(OBJS) $(SLIBOBJS) $(SUBDIR)lib$(NAME).ver >> $(SLIB_CREATE_DEF_CMD) >> - $$(LD) $(SHFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $$(LD_O) $$(filter %.o,$$^) >> $(FFEXTRALIBS) >> + $$(LD) $(SHFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(LDEXEFLAGS) $$(LD_O) $$(filter >> %.o,$$^) $(FFEXTRALIBS) >> $(SLIB_EXTRA_CMD) > > LDEXEFLAGS is clearly not the appropriate way to go about this. These > flags are for executables, not for shared libraries. > > - Hendrik
Ok, so is it fine if this gets added to LDFLAGS instead? Or should a separate e.g LDLIBFLAGS be used? > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel