On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 10:21:47AM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> > > wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde > >>> <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Fixes Ticket4673 > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> library.mak | 2 +- > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/library.mak b/library.mak > >>>> index 29460b8..401da7c 100644 > >>>> --- a/library.mak > >>>> +++ b/library.mak > >>>> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ $(SUBDIR)$(SLIBNAME): $(SUBDIR)$(SLIBNAME_WITH_MAJOR) > >>>> > >>>> $(SUBDIR)$(SLIBNAME_WITH_MAJOR): $(OBJS) $(SLIBOBJS) > >>>> $(SUBDIR)lib$(NAME).ver > >>>> $(SLIB_CREATE_DEF_CMD) > >>>> - $$(LD) $(SHFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $$(LD_O) $$(filter %.o,$$^) > >>>> $(FFEXTRALIBS) > >>>> + $$(LD) $(SHFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(LDEXEFLAGS) $$(LD_O) $$(filter > >>>> %.o,$$^) $(FFEXTRALIBS) > >>>> $(SLIB_EXTRA_CMD) > >>> > >>> LDEXEFLAGS is clearly not the appropriate way to go about this. These > >>> flags are for executables, not for shared libraries. > >>> > >>> - Hendrik > >> > >> Ok, so is it fine if this gets added to LDFLAGS instead? Or should a > >> separate e.g LDLIBFLAGS be used? > > > > Attached is new patch that creates a LDLIBFLAGS. > > Ping.
breaks build with mingw make ffmpeg/library.mak:111: *** commands commence before first target. Stop. [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB There will always be a question for which you do not know the correct answer.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel