On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 14:10:48 +0000 Paul B Mahol <one...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here I ask for samples which show that one is better than another, > whichever that one is. http://samples.ffmpeg.org/V-codecs/G2M4/XmissPlan052913.wmv ffmpeg -f asf_o -i XmissPlan052913.wmv out.avi [asf_o @ 031c0160] Suspicious data found! ASF stream #2 will be ignored. video:0kB audio:3kB subtitle:0kB other streams:0kB global headers:0kB muxing overhead: 308.914154% 3kb? -f asf works. http://samples.ffmpeg.org/mplayer-bugs/bug821/bug821-2.asf ffmpeg -f asf_o -i bug821-2.asf outtt.avi [asf_o @ 031c0140] Could not find codec parameters for stream 0 (Video: mpeg4 (MP4S / 0x5334504D), n one, 640x480): unspecified pixel format Consider increasing the value for the 'analyzeduration' and 'probesize' options bug821-2.asf: could not find codec parameters works in -f asf. http://samples.ffmpeg.org/dvr_ms/fps_sample1.dvr-ms http://samples.ffmpeg.org/dvr_ms/SS2.dvr-ms some kind of error in -f asf_o , works in -f asf more later. -compn _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel