Hi On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:58:29PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 23:49, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:30:15PM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, at 19:15, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > >> >> Le torstaina 9. marraskuuta 2023, 19.41.53 EET Michael Niedermayer a > >> >> écrit : > >> > [...] > >> >> If you think some people should be added, as far as I am concerned, you > >> >> are of > >> >> course welcome to nudge them via private message to friendly remind > >> >> them that > >> >> they can nominate themselves. > >> > > >> > so what i will do then is > >> > If a developer was in the GA before || are just under the threshold but > >> > active || are part of the infra teams and packaging > >> > i will leave them in the list to be added (that is also what jb > >> > suggested) > >> > >> Of course, this seems reasonable. > >> > >> > I will contact them and ask if they want to be in the GA and > >> > >> You should contact who you want, or think is necessary. > >> But they should step forward and say so publicly that they are candidates. > > > > last time you collected candidates you said something very different > > > > https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2020-June/265348.html > > > > "If you are interested in being a candidate, please mail me in private > > (aka not on the list). > > You can suggest another candidate, but I will validate with them if > > they might agree in the end." > > > > I want to use the exact same process, why you and other people demand > > a higher bar ? > > First, because noone said anything else on that thread to ask for it to be > public.
> And then, because people complained after that it was not public, at the > following meeting. > So we said that we would do differently the following time. Was this a FFmpeg meeting or a (weekly) FFlabs meeting ? ive been in only one FFLabs meeting and that must have been years after this. So obviously thats a differnt case ... And in that one meeting FFmpeg voting was discussed towards the end of the meeting. id like to point out that FFlabs is a commercial entity and not the right place to discuss anything about FFmpeg governance or votes. thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Frequently ignored answer#1 FFmpeg bugs should be sent to our bugtracker. User questions about the command line tools should be sent to the ffmpeg-user ML. And questions about how to use libav* should be sent to the libav-user ML.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
