On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, at 14:16, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> First, because noone said anything else on that thread to ask for it to be >> public. > >> And then, because people complained after that it was not public, at the >> following meeting. >> So we said that we would do differently the following time. > > Was this a FFmpeg meeting or a (weekly) FFlabs meeting ?
An FFmpeg one. > And in that one meeting FFmpeg voting was discussed towards the end of the > meeting. You remember all the contents of all FFmpeg meetings since 2020, including all the calls, the FOSDEM and VDD ones? I don't. I remember someone saying it should be public, I said: "sure, that's a good point" and that's it. If people had asked in the previous thread, that's probably what I would have done. Because I'm normal human being, who understand his limitations. People have asked for people becoming candidates to post publicly on this mailing list, I don't see what the big deal in that. -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
