Leo Izen (12024-02-07): > I don't think this is really a fair statement to make. We have lots of > potential reviewers subscribed to this list but very few people actually > review code, and those that do review code are expected to provide some sort > of technical objection or reason why it shouldn't be merged. A random > subscriber without commit access posting "Nak" on a patch without explaining > why isn't grounds to block it.
A random subscriber cannot do that, but if they are thick as thieves with the people who managed to gain control of the committees, so that they can be sure the tech will side with them and they can threaten you if you point that their objections are flimsy a little too clearly, then they can block your patch with a vague “it does not belong in ffmpeg”, that does require a lot less effort than reviewing. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
