On 8 Feb 2024, at 13:32, Nicolas George wrote:
> Leo Izen (12024-02-07): >> I don't think this is really a fair statement to make. We have lots of >> potential reviewers subscribed to this list but very few people actually >> review code, and those that do review code are expected to provide some sort >> of technical objection or reason why it shouldn't be merged. A random >> subscriber without commit access posting "Nak" on a patch without explaining >> why isn't grounds to block it. > > A random subscriber cannot do that, but if they are thick as thieves > with the people who managed to gain control of the committees, so that Can you maybe stop crying about that things did not went your way on every topic slightly related to FFmpeg „politics“ on this list? This is getting so annoying… The amount of times I had to read your absurd insinuations about there being some „conspiracy“ to take over the project… > they can be sure the tech will side with them and they can threaten you > if you point that their objections are flimsy a little too clearly, then > they can block your patch with a vague “it does not belong in ffmpeg”, > that does require a lot less effort than reviewing. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
