On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, 14:44 Martin Storsjö <mar...@martin.st> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2025, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi Martin > > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:57:05PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote: > >> If there were failures while running tests, e.g. if failing to > >> compile checkasm or any other of the test programs, there are no > >> failed tests per se, and the number of succeessful tests is > >> equal to the total number of tests. > >> > >> For these cases, check the job status code instead of declaring > >> them as a full success. > >> --- > >> history.cgi | 2 +- > >> index.cgi | 2 +- > >> report.cgi | 6 +++++- > >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > sounds reasonable, but ill leave the perl review to someone who actually > > knows perl > > I've tested it locally, so if we have nobody else volunteering to review > it, is that enough? > > > Its a few years since the last change to fateserver, i think we dont > > have a script to update the checkout on the server from a git push. > > Its a while, i dont remember exactly :) > > so you have to update that checkout after pushing possibly > > I don't think I have access to any such server, but if it's ok with you > can I (try to) push this patch to the gitosis repo, and then ask some > admin (Timo?) to possibly update a checkout somewhere. > > // Martin > There is also https://fatebeta.ffmpeg.org/, should it be updated for parity with perl version? - Kacper > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
