On Fri, 27 Jun 2025, Kacper Michajlow wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025, 14:44 Martin Storsjö <mar...@martin.st> wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi Martin
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 01:57:05PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
>> If there were failures while running tests, e.g. if failing to
>> compile checkasm or any other of the test programs, there are no
>> failed tests per se, and the number of succeessful tests is
>> equal to the total number of tests.
>>
>> For these cases, check the job status code instead of declaring
>> them as a full success.
>> ---
>> history.cgi | 2 +-
>> index.cgi | 2 +-
>> report.cgi | 6 +++++-
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> sounds reasonable, but ill leave the perl review to someone who actually
> knows perl
I've tested it locally, so if we have nobody else volunteering to review
it, is that enough?
> Its a few years since the last change to fateserver, i think we dont
> have a script to update the checkout on the server from a git push.
> Its a while, i dont remember exactly :)
> so you have to update that checkout after pushing possibly
I don't think I have access to any such server, but if it's ok with you
can I (try to) push this patch to the gitosis repo, and then ask some
admin (Timo?) to possibly update a checkout somewhere.
// Martin
There is also https://fatebeta.ffmpeg.org/, should it be updated for parity
with perl version?
AFAIK that site prints this aspect correctly.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
