On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 10:48 PM Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > Imagine people try to game this and we thus have more contributions and > more reviewed, fewer unreviewed patches. That sounds like a good thing > to me > > [...] > Maybe iam just odd but i want to know if forgejo or the ML actually works > better for the FFmpeg community before I decide how I vote. > I assumed others also want to know that before they vote >
IIRC, this test was supposed to run for a month. Given its a shift to a new way of working, it will take a while before it catches on, according to the above metrics. Probably longer than a month. Are you, one of the main active reviewers, giving the forge a test this month, using it exclusively instead of the ML? That alone will sway the statistics tremendously. All the best, Dee _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
