On 2025-11-11 12:19 pm, Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
Le 11 novembre 2025 04:59:42 GMT+02:00, Michael Niedermayer via
ffmpeg-devel<[email protected]> a écrit :
Hi Remi
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:03:38PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont via ffmpeg-devel
wrote:
Le lauantaina 8. marraskuuta 2025, 10.34.24 Itä-Euroopan normaaliaika Thomas
Dullien via ffmpeg-devel a écrit :
What's the best way to submit these patches? There is the bug tracker,
there is this mailing list - what's the best way to contribute them?
I don't think that DNN-generated patches are compatible with the LGPL in the
first place, or it is at best very uncertain that they are. So then you cannot
contribute DNN-generated patches in any useful way at all.
If you have concrete legal analysis or case law that supports this claim,
please share it.
You can check what LF, Fedora, QEMU, etc, and their lawyers already did on that
front.
QEMU is the only one which forbids AI
https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/3d40db0efc
The others provide caveats but do provide a pathway for AI contributions.
The Linux Foundation says, "Code or other content generated in whole or
in part using AI tools can be contributed to Linux Foundation projects.
..."
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/legal/generative-ai
Fedora says, this, "You *MAY* use AI assistance for contributing to
Fedora, as long as you follow the principles described below..."
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/council/policy/ai-contribution-policy/
Regards,
Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
