On Thu, 13 Nov 2025, 03:07 Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel, < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Kieran > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 12:09:00AM -0800, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2025, 19:00 Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel, < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Remi > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 06:03:38PM +0200, Rémi Denis-Courmont via > > > ffmpeg-devel wrote: > > > > Le lauantaina 8. marraskuuta 2025, 10.34.24 Itä-Euroopan normaaliaika > > > Thomas > > > > Dullien via ffmpeg-devel a écrit : > > > > > What's the best way to submit these patches? There is the bug > tracker, > > > > > there is this mailing list - what's the best way to contribute > them? > > > > > > > > I don't think that DNN-generated patches are compatible with the > LGPL in > > > the > > > > first place, or it is at best very uncertain that they are. So then > you > > > cannot > > > > contribute DNN-generated patches in any useful way at all. > > > > > > If you have concrete legal analysis or case law that supports this > claim, > > > please share it. > > > > > > > If an LLM was trained on the leaked Microsoft Windows source code and it > > used elements of that code when asked to write an FFmpeg patch, would > that > > patch be acceptable in your eyes? > > If a human was trained on the leaked Microsoft Windows source code and he > used elements of that code when asked to write an FFmpeg patch, would that > patch be acceptable in your eyes? > > We should forbid human written code? > An AI is not a human. AIs have been shown to regurgitate copyrighted material when asked to solve a problem. Kieran > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
