On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 6:32 PM Nicolas Gaullier via ffmpeg-devel
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 1/8/26 08:32, Christophe Gisquet via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> > Le jeu. 8 janv. 2026, 02:24, mypopy--- via ffmpeg-devel <
> > [email protected]> a écrit :
> >> As James Almer pointed out in his response, the current merge request
> >> has already removed the muxer component, so there won't be any
> >> compatibility issues, even if the specification is still in draft
> >> status.
> >>
> >> AV1 in TS is already being utilized in certain scenarios, and we also
> >> need an implementation to validate this specification concurrently
> > Well, I don't particularly like that argument (flv extension again by some
> > operator?), but this is beside the point.
>
> I also don't particularly like that argument, but what I do not
> understand is why we cannot get a public sample for sharing ?
>
> It seems to me this demuxer-case should require FF_COMPLIANCE_EXPERIMENTAL.
>
I completely agree with this suggestion. In fact, I had thought about
adding FF_COMPLIANCE_EXPERIMENTAL, but I unfortunately overlooked it
during the many iterations.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
