On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 06:39:02PM +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 23:26:44 +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> >> In addition to Ganesh's comments: >> >> > +@item amount >> > +Set modulation. Define how much of original signal is affected by the LFO. >> [...] >> > +@item width >> > +Set pulse width. >> >> I would appreciate ranges for both od these. I would guess them being >> [0..1] (and I coould read the code), but who knows. >> > > or do ffmpeg -h filter=apulsator
I thought the common idiom was to document these ranges twice, i.e in both the docs and implicitly in the code via the options table? > > -- > Clément B. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
