On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:24:00 -0500 "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:51 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:48:11 -0500 > >> "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > If pkt->size == 0 && pkt->side_data_elems == 0 after bsf->filter() > >> > > returns, the packet is considered dropped. > >> > > >> > > >> > Ping? > >> > > >> > >> (Personally I'm not so fond of such subtle API changes, also doesn't > >> Libav's glorious new BSF API cover this?) > > > > > > Possibly, but it's not in yet, is it? > > > > (We can revert this piece of code when their new API lands.) > > > > Ping again? I guess you can't wait for the Libav BSF change, but admittedly that has an unknown time frame. But please add the changes in semantics to apichanges.txt. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
