On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:38:13AM +0200, Lauri Kasanen wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 03:26:50 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 07:19:45PM +0200, Lauri Kasanen wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:22:36 +0100 > > > Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > > the full fate tests must be run, many of these tests use swscale without > > > > having "scale" in their name > > > > and yes on lower end hardware 20min and longer is possible > > > > > > I get failures on the baseline, without my patch. What is the procedure > > > here? Is there a var to skip those tests, or? > > > > procedure ? > > First i try to convince you to attempt to fix some of these failures ;) > > because well, everyone would benefit if they are fixed ... > > I mean, if my patch adds no failures, is that enough to apply it?
yes that and the tests failing should still fail the same way with the same checksums This of course assumes noone finds an issue in the patch [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Freedom in capitalist society always remains about the same as it was in ancient Greek republics: Freedom for slave owners. -- Vladimir Lenin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel