On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Lauri Kasanen wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 23:01:02 +0100 > Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:38:13AM +0200, Lauri Kasanen wrote: > > > I mean, if my patch adds no failures, is that enough to apply it? > > > > yes that and the tests failing should still fail the same way with the > > same checksums > > This of course assumes noone finds an issue in the patch > > Okay, ran both with -k. No new failures, and fate-rv20-1239 failed with > the same checksums in both cases. That was the only failing test, did > not try with THREADS.
ok, will apply
thanks
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
