On 12-01-2019 12:51 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
To take a line from your post:
Are you against privacy?
Patches should generally be considered on their own merit. Any such
information will only bias any discussions and result in more
conflict.
One angle that I haven't seen brought up is legal encumbrance.
When someone submits a patch, it is implicit, unless stated otherwise,
that it is of their own initiative (and their own work), and thus they
are free to assign copyright. When work is performed for hire, the
copyright may belong to the employer. Such sponsored work cannot be
'donated' to the project unless the employer agrees to it - it is not
for the patch submitter to decide. In such a scenario, the project
should know who holds the copyright and under what terms are they
willing to submit a patch.
Gyan
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
