James Almer (12019-01-13): > Be the change you want in the world and post your day job income here > for all to see. Otherwise drop this absurd obsession of yours and let > people have a peaceful weekend.
Of course: All that I have received related to my work on FFmpeg is: - coverage of my expanses to attend the VDD; - some t-shirts and a few goodies. The money that I would have received for mentoring in GSoC 2015 was given to the project. Note that I do not make a point of pride of not having gotten much of street value from my work on this project, this is not the reason I do it. But you asked. And to prove I really do not consider this a matter of privacy, I can add my income from not-FFmpeg related: I am a public servant of the French Éducation nationale in the PRAG corps at the salary step 9 with as little overtime as accepted (0-2 hours depending on the year) plus one hour of oral interrogation in prépa and a few yearly hours of coordination with a project. The monetary amounts for all this is of public record. > A patch pushed without review, if it gets challenged after the fact, > will get reverted unless fixed/addressed, like it happened plenty of > times. And who will do the challenging, since we already do not have enough time to review the patches in the first place? Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
