Dennis Mungai <dmng...@gmail.com>, 20 Mar 2019 Çar, 23:20 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 23:02, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, at 20:52, Marton Balint wrote: > > >> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > >> > > >> > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, at 19:34, Marton Balint wrote: > > >> >> As I described in similar threads before, whether or not the > project > > want > > >> >> closed source support for NDI is a subjective issue, please start a > > vote > > >> >> about the removal of libndi if you want to seek this through. > > >> > > > >> > The removal of libndi is actually done and committed. > > >> > > >> That is just sad an unfair. > > > > > > Sad, maybe. > > > Unfair, I disagree. If NDI wants to be in, they know what to do. > > > > It is unfair towards the people who expressied disapproval, yet this > > change was committed without neither vote nor consensus. > > > > Regards, > > Marton > > > > > > > At the very best, the lack of consensus on this implies vindictive intent. > Is there something that the FFmpeg developers (see below) have against > Newtek, as a company? > Clearly, they took down the offending FFmpeg build: > https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589?cversion=0&cnum_hist=10 > > We've seen other violations, such as this one by Amazon: > https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7214 that were handled in a much more > graceful manner. > > The primary agitator here seems to be kierank: > https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/7589?cversion=0&cnum_hist=10#comment:5 > > What undisclosed history do you have with Newtek (see the reference to > "Andrew") above that isn't disclosed above? > Secondly, you're quite influential in the broadcast industry: > https://www.obe.tv/author/obe/ > > There's an aura of hostility around this commit, and whatever that is seems > to have spilled over into this. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel The way of removal is not nice. There were an expectation to have a voting for removal at the previous ML chain. It feels the feeling of the patch is committed without any notice. Sad, for the users who follow git-master and get notice for removal after the commit. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel