On 2019-03-26 21:22, Mike Stoner via ffmpeg-devel wrote: > Hello, > I’ve accounted for all feedback on this so far, I’m wondering if it is ready > to be pushed upstream? > > Here are my results from ‘checkasm’ (lower is better): > > v210_unpack_c: 1636 > v210_unpack_ssse3: 611 > v210_unpack_avx: 601 > v210_unpack_avx2: 423 > > I ran it 5 times and averaged the middle 3 results for each CPU target > (ignoring the highest and lowest time). > > https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/12325/ > > > Thanks… -Mike
Sorry that I keep forgetting about this. I will try to make some time tomorrow to give this another look over. I'm not sure what order this and my checkasm patch should be applied in, which I also forgot about. Did anyone else make comments on either patch?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
