Am Do., 27. Juni 2019 um 14:59 Uhr schrieb Zhong Li <zhong...@intel.com>:
> +/* return the 8 bit start code value and update the search
> + state. Return -1 if no start code found */
> +static int find_frame_header_marker(const uint8_t **pbuf_ptr, const uint8_t
> *buf_end)
> +{
> + const uint8_t *buf_ptr;
> + unsigned int v, v2;
> + int val;
> + int skipped = 0;
> +
> + buf_ptr = *pbuf_ptr;
> + while (buf_end - buf_ptr > 1) {
> + v = *buf_ptr++;
> + v2 = *buf_ptr;
> + if ((v == 0xff) && buf_ptr < buf_end &&
> + ((v2 >= SOF0) && (v2 <= SOF3)) ) {
> + val = *buf_ptr++;
> + goto found;
> + }
> + skipped++;
> + }
> + buf_ptr = buf_end;
> + val = -1;
> +found:
> + ff_dlog(NULL, "find_marker skipped %d bytes\n", skipped);
> + *pbuf_ptr = buf_ptr;
> + return val;
> +}
Sorry for not realizing this earlier (I searched for "SOF0"):
Why is this function duplicated?
Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
