> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] LLossless (10 Bit RGB 444) and (10 Bit YUV 422) > Compression > > Jason Freets <jasonslife <at> hotmail.com> writes: > > > No, you were not unclear. The 2 files I uploaded > > were created by the AJA codec. Before your fix, > > only the r10k (Little Endian) file did not play. > > The R10K (Big Endian) always did play fine (before > > and after your fix). With your new fix, now the > > r10k (Little Endian) also now plays correctly > > using FFmpeg. > > Unfortunately, this is not what I wanted to know;-( > > Any chance that you could test what I asked for?
I believe you wanted me to run: ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -t 10 -vcodec r10k out.avi Yes, this does work. It creates a R10K (Big Edian) video file. The R10K (Big Edian) video file does play. Since the "-vcodec r10k" is a little 'r' I was expecting a "r10k" (Little Endian) video file. To me it would be nice if: "ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -t 10 -vcodec R10k out.avi" would output a R10k (Big Endian) video file. and "ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -t 10 -vcodec r10k out.avi" would output a r10k (Little Endian) video file. That depends if the "-vcodec r10k" is case sensitive. > > > So the question I have is if there will be a fix > > put in place to have FFmpeg write r10k (Little > > Endian)? Too hard to do? Or? > > Useless? > Or don't you agree? No, it would not be useless for me. I have a lot of r10k (Little Endian) video files. I suppose it's a "nice" to have. It would make things consistent that FFmpeg can Input and Ouput both R10k and r10k. I then have a way to convert from r10k to FFV1 and back to the original r10k when needed. If I could, I'd put it in because I would make good use of it. But, I suppose if I am the only one, then I suppose that makes it a bit useless too. However, those who use AJA would know they could use FFmpeg; that's a nice thing. So, I and others would benefit from it if and where r10k is used. I suppose that's something for you to have to decide. Obviously, no one has complained about r10k (Little Endian) support under FFmpeg but me...haha. Obviously, I can't put it in myself. If I could, I would for everyone. Still, I have no way to validate my conversion from r10k to FFV1? How do I know frames are not corrupt? Cheers, Jason > > Carl Eugen > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
