Jason Freets <jasonslife <at> hotmail.com> writes: > I wouldn't use FFmpeg if I didn't trust it =). For > v210, I've proven it to myself and use FFV1 a lot. > For r10k, it's still not there yet.
I should add here that while ffv1 is a complicated codec, r10k (like v210) is so trivial that you can be sure there is no issue after a short test. (I don't know how to prove that ffv1 does what you want, I don't even know if it can be proven.) > Making progress though. For this reason, I keep > everything in original r10k format. I won't > convert r10k files to FFV1 until I have a way to > verify the conversion is done properly. I showed you a way. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
