Am Sa., 18. Apr. 2020 um 19:27 Uhr schrieb pdr0 <[email protected]>: > > Carl Eugen Hoyos-2 wrote > > Am Sa., 18. Apr. 2020 um 00:53 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak > > < > > > markfilipak.windows+ffmpeg@ > > > >: > > > >> I'm not using the 46 telecine anymore because you introduced me to > >> 'pp=linblenddeint' > >> -- thanks again! -- which allowed me to decomb via the 55 telecine. > > > > Why do you think that pp is a better de-interlacer than yadif? > > (On hardware younger that's not more than ten years old.) > > It's not a question of "better" in his case. > > It's a very specific scenario - He needs to keep that combed frame, as a > single frame to retain the pattern.
I know, while I agree with all other developers that this is useless, I have explained how it can be done. > Single rate deinterlacing by any method > will cause you to choose either the top field or bottom field, resulting in > a duplicate frame or the prior or next frame - and it's counterproductive > for what he wanted (blend deinterlacing to keep both fields as a single > frame) (To the best of my knowledge, this is technically simply not true.) yadif by default does not change the number of frames. (Or in other words: It works just like the pp algorithms, only better) Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
