Hi,

> In the case of "interlace":
> "It's interlaced video" -- video in which the lines alternate (i.e. are 
> interlaced) between two (or theoretically, more) fields (e.g. 
> odd-even-odd-even...). That employs the past participle of the verb, 
> "interlace", as an adjective to modify "video".
> 
> H.262 refers to "interlace video" when referring to hard telecine. But 
> "interlace video" is a bit of a mutt. "Interlace" is clearly being used as an 
> adjective, yet "interlace" is not a participle (past or present) -- 
> "interlaced" is the past participle and "interlacing" is the present 
> participle. What it would have to be is a verbal adjective (i.e. a verb used 
> as an adjective). I may be wrong, but I don't think there exists such a thing 
> as a verbal adjective.
That's more or less what a participle is.

> A hard telecined video residing on a disc is clearly not interlaced. It is 
> clearly deinterlaced (i.e. stored in fields). Since it is deinterlaced, it 
> can be fed directly to a scanning TV (i.e. CRT) provided it is of the proper 
> frame rate, or it can be interlaced -- a verb -- by a decoder as part of the 
> decoding step.

Is it? Hard telecine is like telecining film and then recording it on a VCR, 
isn't it? And you don't need to deinterlace interlaced video to display it on 
an interlaced scanning TV. I think the confusion is when you deinterlace 
interlaced video, it is still interlaced video (or at least I think of it that 
way).

Regards,
Ted Park

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to